Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Thijmen Loof vs Kiranpal Pannu Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Loof vs Pannu analysis and find out who is favored!
Thijmen Loof vs Kiranpal Pannu Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Loof 1 - 0 Pannu
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Loof has won 44.95% of points on their second serve, while Pannu has won 45.61%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Loof, in recent form, has won 47.39% of their opponent's second serve points, while Pannu has won 52.69%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.24% and 38.84% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Loof has saved 67.3% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Pannu has saved 51.82% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Loof has won 45.65% of matches played (W/L 21/ 25), with Pannu winning 61.29% (W/L 38/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Loof has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 25/ 22), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Pannu has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 79/ 47), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 10/ 13).
- Player level: In the last year, Loof has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 45.65% of matches (W/L 21/ 25), where as Pannu has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68.57% of matches (W/L 24/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Loof winning 1 times and Pannu being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Loof winning 2 and Pannu winning 1. The last match between Loof and Pannu was at the M25 Mosquera, 24-04-2024, First, Clay with Thijmen Loof getting the victory 2-6 6-4 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:36:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Loof and Pannu have played a deciding set 1 times, with Loof winning 1 times and Pannu 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Loof winning 0, and Pannu 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Loof has played against opponents with an average rank of 36.57 while Pannu has played against players with an average rank of 175.19.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Loof has won 38% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Pannu has won 73% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Loof has converted 44.64% of breakpoint opportunities, and Pannu has converted 53.16% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
451
Rank
451
High
27
Age
Plays
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
Form
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
47% (59-67)
Career Total W/L
59% (119-83)
52% (15-14)
YTD W/L
67% (24-12)
$0
Career Prize Money
$14,725
0
YTD Titles
2
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Thijmen Loof vs Kiranpal Pannu For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Loof VS Pannu
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Thijmen Loof | Kiranpal Pannu |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 14 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 3 |
| DFs Total | 3 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:36:0 | 2:36:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (46/84) | 66% (58/88) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 65% (30/46) | 71% (41/58) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 58% (22/38) | 30% (9/30) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 33% (3/9) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (38/88) | 38% (32/84) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Thijmen Loof
Player
Kiranpal Pannu
55%
(
46 of
84)
1st Serve %
66%
(
58 of
88)
8
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
82
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Thijmen Loof | Kiranpal Pannu |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 52% (15/14) | 67% (24/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 52% (34/31) | 60% (49/32) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (317/299) | 54% (393/334) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 78% (7/2) | 73% (19/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 53% (8/7) | 50% (5/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.29 | 0.32 |
| Aces Total | 88 | 114 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0.22 |
| DFs Total | 64 | 77 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:16:53 | 1:45:12 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 31.48 | 171.97 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (965/1490) | 63% (1381/2190) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (661/965) | 66% (915/1381) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (236/525) | 46% (369/809) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (50/112) | 53% (126/237) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (517/1395) | 44% (932/2108) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Futures W/L | 52% (15/14) | 72% (21/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 56% (15/27) | 67% (22/33) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (6/10) | 89% (8/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 57% (4/7) | 75% (9/12) |
| 1st set W, W | 81% (16/13) | 95% (19/18) |
| 1st set W, L | 19% (16/3) | 5% (19/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 15% (13/2) | 29% (17/5) |
Thijmen Loof Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Thijmen Loof
Player
Adrien Berrut
74%
(
60 of
81)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
80)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
80)
87
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Massimo Giunta
Player
Thijmen Loof
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
54%
(
51 of
95)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
7
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
95)
91
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Peter Fajta
Player
Thijmen Loof
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thijmen Loof
Player
Gabor Hornung
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Fryderyk Lechno-Wasiutynski
Player
Thijmen Loof
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
70%
(
33 of
47)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
7%
(
1 of
14)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 3-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Joaquim Almeida
Player
Thijmen Loof
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
4-6 6-0 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Harrison Adams
Player
Thijmen Loof
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
51 of
82)
8
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
72%
(
21 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
24%
(
16 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thijmen Loof
Player
Juan Sebastian Osorio
56%
(
48 of
86)
1st Serve %
64%
(
61 of
95)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
40 of
61)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
95)
96
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thijmen Loof
Player
Tobias Franco
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
8 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Kiranpal Pannu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Kiranpal Pannu
Player
Fnu Nidunjianzan
69%
(
81 of
117)
1st Serve %
60%
(
65 of
109)
5
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
57 of
81)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
44 of
65)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
37%
(
43 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
41 of
109)
115
Total Points Won
111
|
6-4 5-7 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Kiranpal Pannu
Player
Juan Carlos Manuel Aguilar
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kiranpal Pannu
Player
Arvid Nordquist
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kiranpal Pannu
Player
Kian Vakili
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve %
61%
(
19 of
31)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
9 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
44
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 | 7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Arvid Nordquist
Player
Kiranpal Pannu
69%
(
56 of
81)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
1
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
0
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
30 of
37)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
36 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
18 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(2) 1-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Leo Borg
Player
Kiranpal Pannu
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kiranpal Pannu
Player
Aryan Shah
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
44%
(
21 of
48)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kiranpal Pannu
Player
Matt Kuhar
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
62%
(
52 of
84)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
9
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
42%
(
35 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
87
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kiranpal Pannu
Player
Daniel Azar
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Loof Vs Pannu Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Loof are available here and Pannu photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
